托福英语写作模板

托福英语写作模板

综合写作作文要以听力材料为主。下面是分享的托福综合写作模板，希望能帮到大家!

The lecture is mainly discussing , and by , challenging what are stated in the reading

passage that , and .First of all, the speaker thinks that . In contrast, the reading

passage believes that . So, the lecture totally disagree with the view made in the reading.Second, the speaker

discusses , Contradicting what is stated in the reading that .Finally, the speakers raises

the issue that . This point disagrees that demonstrated in the reading.So, the contents in the

reading passage are totally jeopardized by the speaker and the speaker has totally different ideas on the topics made in the reading.

The speaker in the lecture principally argues that (听力中心大意，一句话归纳), which contradict the main statement in the reading, thus refuting the reading passage totally.

In order to substantiate his contention as well as to jeopardize the reading passage, the speaker later reexams the supporting details

in the reading passage and forwards alternative explanations.In terms of (听力第一个分论点), the speaker argues that (进展解释说明), challenging the notion in the reading that (阅读第一个分论点)Referring to(听力第二个分论点), the speaker, believes that (进展解释说明). In contrast, the reading passage (阅读第二个分论点)Finally, the speaker raises the issue that(听力第三个分论点), which was simply noted as (阅读第三个分论点)in the reading.

To sum up, based on thorough analysis of the whole situation (the nature of the reasons in the reading, the speaker disagrees with the

reading passage pletely.

托福综合写作模板：开始段

In this argument, the arguer concludes that . To support the conclusion, the arguer points out that. In addition, the arguer reasons that.This argument suffers from several critical fallacies.

In this argument, the arguer remends that.To justify this claim, the arguer provides the evidence that . In addition, he cites the result of a recent study that . A careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless the conclusion is.

In this analysis, the arguer claims that . To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer cites the example that. In addition, the arguer assumes that . This argument is unconvincing for several critical flaws.

In this argument, the arguer advocates that . The remendation is based on the observation that. Meanwhile, the arguer assumes that. The argument is problematic for two reasons.

The conclusion in this argument is that. In support of this prediction, the arguer claims that .Moreover, the arguer assumes that. This argument is fraught with vague, oversimplified and unwarranted assumptions.

First, the argument is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that, but he does not provide any evidence that.

Second, the arguer mits a fallacy of hasty generalization. Even if, it does not follow that。

Besides, the arguer does not provide any solid information concerning that.

Actually, the arguer’s remendation of would most probably turns out to be ineffective and misleading.

In the first place, the arguer fails to take into aount the factors in the analysis. While we are informed that , the arguer fails to make clear that.

In the second place, the parison in this argument is inplete and selective, the arguer discovers that . However the arguer fails to provide any information regarding .

Furthermore .

Unless the arguer also takes these factors into consideration, the parison is unconvincing.

First of all, the argument is based on a hasty generalization. Aording to the cited studies, . The fact tells very little about . Even if we aept the arguer’s assumption that, it is unwarranted to assume that.

In addition, the arguer fails to consider several other relevant factors that. For instance, .

What’ s more,.

Finally, the arguer hints that, but he fails to analyze that.

The major problem with this argument is that the arguer fails to convince us that . First, the fact that does indicate that. Second, , which makes it impossible for us to evaluate thatAnother point worth considering is the arguer’s hasty generalization. We are informed that, but we do not know that. We can believe that , but based on this slim information, we can never evaluate the overall

performance of discount.

One major assumption in short of legitimacy is that. First, . Second, . This may prove misleading and counterproductive in the end.

In addition, the conclusion is based on a gratuitous assumption that. This, however, is unwarranted.

In summary, the conclusion reached in this argument is in valid and misleading. To make the argument more convincing, the arguer would have to prove that. Moreover, I would suspend my judgment about the credibility of the remendation until the arguer can provide concrete evidence that. Otherwise, the arguer is simply begging the question throughout the argument.

To conclude, the argument is not persuasive as it stands. Before we aept the conclusion, the arguer must present more facts that. To solidify the argument, the arguer would have to produce more evidence concerning.

As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically aeptable, the arguer would have to demonstrate that . Additionally, the arguer must provide evidence to .

To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument the arguer would have to provide more evidence

concerning that.

In conclusion, the arguer fails to . To strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide evidence that. To better evaluate the argument, we need more information about that.